Michael Kator Cases

1. DAVIS v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF THE TREASURY, No. 87-1020, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 489 U.S. 803; 109 S. Ct. 1500; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1667; 103 L. Ed. 2d 891; 57 U.S.L.W. 4389; 89-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9456; 63 A.F.T.R.2d (P-H) 1174; 10 E.B.C. 2097, January 9, 1989, Argued, March 28, 1989, Decided

2. UNITED STATES DOJ v. REPORTERS COMM. FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, No. 87-1379, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 489 U.S. 749; 109 S. Ct. 1468; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1574; 103 L. Ed. 2d 774; 57 U.S.L.W. 4373; 16 Media L. Rep. 1545, December 7, 1988, Argued, March 22, 1989, Decided

3. SHERIDAN v. United States, No. 87-626, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 487 U.S. 392; 108 S. Ct. 2449; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2873; 101 L. Ed. 2d 352; 56 U.S.L.W. 4761, April 26, 1988, Argued, June 24, 1988, Decided

4. Peralta v. Heights Med. Ctr., Inc., No. 86-1430, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 485 U.S. 80; 108 S. Ct. 896; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 944; 99 L. Ed. 2d 75; 56 U.S.L.W. 4189, November 30, 1987, Argued, February 24, 1988, Decided

5. UNITED STATES v. FAUSTO, No. 86-595, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 484 U.S. 439; 108 S. Ct. 668; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 574; 98 L. Ed. 2d 830; 56 U.S.L.W. 4128, Argued October 7, 1987, January 25, 1988

6. CORNELIUS v. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC. FUND, INC., No. 84-312, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 473 U.S. 788; 105 S. Ct. 3439; 1985 U.S. LEXIS 133; 87 L. Ed. 2d 567; 53 U.S.L.W. 5116, February 19, 1985, Argued, July 2, 1985, Decided

7. LINDAHL v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MGMT., No. 83-5954, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 470 U.S. 768; 105 S. Ct. 1620; 1985 U.S. LEXIS 77; 84 L. Ed. 2d 674; 53 U.S.L.W. 4371, December 3, 1984, Argued, March 20, 1985, Decided

8. WILSON v. PENA, No. 94-5273, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 79 F.3d 154; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 5129; 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P44,005; 316 U.S. App. D.C. 352, November 3, 1995, Argued, March 22, 1996, Decided

9. CASTLE v. RUBIN, No. 95-5087, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 78 F.3d 654; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4492; 316 U.S. App. D.C. 293, March 15, 1996, Filed

10. DIAMOND v. ATWOOD, Nos. 93-5235, 93-5246, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 43 F.3d 1538; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1067; 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1249; 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P43,447; 310 U.S. App. D.C. 113, October 20, 1994, Argued, January 20, 1995, Decided

11. Barth v. Gelb, No. 91-5199, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 2 F.3d 1180; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21668; 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42,659; 303 U.S. App. D.C. 211, November 2, 1992, Argued, August 27, 1993, Decided

12. BURKEY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLES. HOSP. ASSN., No. 91-3653., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 983 F.2d 656; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2320; 16 E.B.C. 1682, February 17, 1993, Decided, As Corrected.

13. SHERIDAN v. UNITED STATES, No. 91-1865, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 969 F.2d 72; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16315, May 4, 1992, Argued, July 8, 1992, Decided

14. HONG-YEE CHIU v. UNITED STATES, No. 90-5044, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 948 F.2d 711; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25427, October 29, 1991, Decided, As Corrected November 22, 1991.

15. PROUD v. STONE, No. 90-2443, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 945 F.2d 796; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22252; 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 301; 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40,979, July 10, 1991, Argued, September 23, 1991, Decided

16. OLSON v. MOBIL OIL CORP., No. 89-2349, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 904 F.2d 198; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8234; 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1543; 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P39,926, January 9, 1990, Argued, May 21, 1990, Decided, Rehearing Denied June 27, 1990, Reported at 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12361.

17. HARRIS v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MGMT., No. 89-3147, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 888 F.2d 121; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15599, October 13, 1989, Decided

18. NATIONAL ASSN. OF RETIRED FED. EMPLES. v. HORNER, No. 86-5446, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 879 F.2d 873; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9773; 279 U.S. App. D.C. 27, April 4, 1987, Argued, July 7, 1989, Decided

19. PROUD v. UNITED STATES, No. 88-5162, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 872 F.2d 1066; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5403; 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1011; 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P38,930; 277 U.S. App. D.C. 96, February 13, 1989, Argued, April 21, 1989, Decided

20. FINN v. UNITED STATES, No. 87-3039, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 856 F.2d 606; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12139, June 8, 1988, Argued September 6, 1988, Decided, As amended.

21. Bryant v. Weinberger, No. 87-3584 RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 838 F.2d 465; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 447, January 20, 1988, Decided

22. Ireland v. Shultz, No. 86-5355, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 829 F.2d 1189; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13087; 265 U.S. App. D.C. 57, September 10, 1987, Argued, October 2, 1987, Decided

23. Light v. Wolf, No. 85-5903, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 816 F.2d 746; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5055; 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 871; 259 U.S. App. D.C. 442, September 25, 1986, Argued, April 17, 1987, Decided

23. DUNNING v. NASA, No. 82-1259, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 718 F.2d 1170; 231 U.S. App. D.C. 132, December 3, 1982, Argued, October 11, 1983, Decided

25. TURNER v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MGMT., No. 82-1436, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 707 F.2d 1499; 228 U.S. App. D.C. 94, January 19, 1983, Argued, May 17, 1983

26. CASTLE v. BENTSEN, Civil No. 93-2643 (CRR), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 872 F. Supp. 1062; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 873, January 20, 1995, Decided, January 23, 1995, FILED

27. CASTLE v. BENTSEN, Civil No. 93-2643 (CRR), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 872 F. Supp. 1055; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 700, January 18, 1995, Decided, January 18, 1995, FILED

28. FOX v. COMMISSIONER, C.A. No. 93-2019 (WBB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19196; 75 A.F.T.R.2d (P-H) 642, December 20, 1994, Decided, December 20, 1994, FILED

29. CASTLE v. BENTSEN, Civil No. 93-2643 (CRR), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 867 F. Supp. 4; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16133, November 8, 1994, Decided, November 8, 1994, Filed

30. DIAMOND v. ROSKENS, Civil Action No. 91-1510 (TPJ), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 790 F. Supp. 350; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7005; 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1312, May 13, 1992, Decided, May 13,1992, Filed

31. NATIONAL ASSN. OF RETIRED FED. EMPLES. v. HORNER, Civil Action No. 85-4021, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 633 F. Supp. 511; 7 E.B.C. 1460, April 17, 1986

32. WIGLER v. ELECTRONIC DATA SYS. CORP., Civil No. R 85-666, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, 108 F.R.D. 204, November 21, 1985, Filed

33. CONNOR v. HODEL, No. 83-1694, United States District Court, District of Columbia, 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 362, May 16, 1984

34. SOBLE v. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, Civil Action No. M-83-290, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, 572 F. Supp. 1509; 33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 611, October 13, 1983

35. VELASQUEZ v. FAURER, Civil No. K-82-1780, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, 101 F.R.D. 8; 38 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1123; 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1094; 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1094, August 29, 1983

36. TURVENE v. UNITED STATES, No. 86-87C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT, 14 Cl. Ct. 227; 1988 U.S. Cl. Ct. LEXIS 12, February 3, 1988

37. IRELAND v. UNITED STATES, No. 602-86C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT, 11 Cl. Ct. 543; 1987 U.S. Cl. Ct. LEXIS 25, February 12, 1987

38. SANTORA v. UNITED STATES, No. 92-85C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT, 10 Cl. Ct. 38, May 16, 1986

39. REICH v. COLLINS, Nos. S92A0621, S92A0622, Supreme Court of Georgia, 263 Ga. 602; 437 S.E.2d 320; 1993 Ga. LEXIS 817; 93 Fulton County DR P4325; 17 E.B.C. 2001, December 2, 1993, Decided

40. MARX v. BROOM, No. 91-CC-00476, CONSOLIDATED WITH: 91-CC-00474, CONSOLIDATED WITH: 91-CC-00475, CONSOLIDATED WITH 91-CC-00422, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, 632 So. 2d 1315; 1994 Miss. LEXIS 117; 18 E.B.C. 1054, February 24, 1994,Decided

41. HAMACHER v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, No. 71870, Supreme Court of Missouri, 779 S.W.2d 565; 1989 Mo. LEXIS 107, November 14, 1989

42. HACKMAN v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, No. 71628, Supreme Court of Missouri, 771 S.W.2d 77; 1989 Mo. LEXIS 58; 11 E.B.C. 1014, May 25, 1989, Filed

43. STRELECKI v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMN., No. 77,615, SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA, 872 P.2d 910; 1993 Okla. LEXIS 143; 64 O.B.A.J. 2885, September 28, 1993, Filed, Rehearing Granted March 17, 1994 and Corrected Order of Clarification, March 23, 1994, Reported at: 1994 Okla. LEXIS 39.

44. HARPER v. VIRGINIA DEPT. OF TAXATION, Record No. 940326, Record No. 940411, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, 250 Va. 184; 462 S.E.2d 892; 1995 Va. LEXIS 99; 12 VLR 185; 19 E.B.C. 1873, September 15, 1995, Decided

Class Action Information

Kator, Parks, Weiser & Harris has extensive experience representing workers in class actions. Find out more about our firm's current and past class actions by clicking here.